Most therapy involves talking about your problem. The Simpson Protocol is unusual because, in principle, you do not have to. The hypnotist may never learn what you came to change. That feature has made it one of the most talked-about methods in modern hypnosis.
Where it came from
The protocol was created by Ines Simpson, a Canadian hypnotist. It addresses an old puzzle. For decades the Esdaile state was regarded as wonderful for pain relief and rest but of limited therapeutic use, because people in it do not respond. Simpson’s contribution was a structured way of communicating with a client at that depth.
The three ideas behind it
1. Work in the deepest state. The client is guided into the Esdaile state, or at least deep somnambulism, usually by an Elman-style induction followed by deepening.
2. Speak to the “superconscious.” The protocol proposes a level of mind above the conscious and the subconscious: a wise, knowing part that understands what the person needs. The hypnotist addresses this part directly and asks it to do the work.
3. Communicate by signal. Because the client is too deep to chat, communication is by ideomotor signals — typically one finger lifting for “yes” and another for “no” — or occasionally by speech.
What a session looks like
- A brief conversation. The client may say as much or as little about the issue as they wish.
- Induction and deepening to the working depth.
- Setting up signals for yes and no.
- Establishing contact with the superconscious and confirming it is willing to help.
- A sequence of closed questions. The hypnotist follows the protocol, asking the superconscious to find what needs to change, to make the change, and to signal when it is done. The hypnotist does not offer interpretations or suggestions of their own.
- Return to full alertness.
Clients often remember little of the middle part and report feeling very rested.
Why people like it
- Privacy. You need not disclose painful or embarrassing details.
- No reliving. Unlike regression-based approaches, it does not ask you to revisit past events, which appeals to people with distressing histories.
- Less risk of the therapist leading you. Because the hypnotist is not suggesting causes or probing for memories, there is less scope for creating false ones — a real hazard in some other methods.
- Client-centred. The framing is that your own mind knows best.
What to keep in mind
- There are no published clinical trials. Support for the Simpson Protocol consists of practitioner reports and client testimonials.
- The “superconscious” is a model. It is a way of talking about the mind, borrowed from spiritual and transpersonal traditions. It is not an established psychological or neurological structure.
- Finger signals are not a lie detector. Research on the ideomotor effect shows that people can make small movements without feeling that they are doing so, and that these movements tend to follow their expectations. A lifting finger is real, but it does not prove that a separate, all-knowing part of the mind is answering. (See our post on ideomotor signalling.)
- Content-free cuts both ways. If nobody knows what was worked on, it is hard to judge whether it was dealt with. Pay attention to whether your day-to-day life actually changes.
- It is not a medical treatment. Practitioners sometimes describe physical improvements. Do not use it in place of diagnosis or care.
Is it for you?
It may appeal if you want a gentle, private, deeply relaxing approach and are comfortable with its spiritual-leaning language. If you want a method with a research base, look to CBT or to clinical hypnotherapy for a condition where trials exist.
The bottom line
The Simpson Protocol is an elegant procedure that many clients find helpful and respectful. Its explanation of why it works is a belief system, not a tested theory. You can value the first without having to accept the second.
Next in the series: Ultra-Height: Going Up Instead of Down
This article is for general information and is not medical advice. This site is not affiliated with the Simpson Protocol.